Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Publication Date
29 September 2023

First Use of Shallow Ice Cores to Constrain Precipitation Over Ice Sheets

Subtitle
Findings lead to improved E3SM ice sheet surface mass balance simulations.
Print / PDF
Powerpoint Slide
Image
Taylor diagram shows ERA5, MERRA2 observational reanalyses best match net accumulation from SUMup ice cores on Greenland, Antarctica
Science

The plurality of sea-level rise is due to Greenland ice-sheet (GrIS) surface melt, yet estimated ice-sheet snowfall, the source of the melt, varies widely among observational reanalyses. We used a database of shallow ice core measurements to identify the best reanalyses for ice sheet simulations.

Impact

Researchers now know to spin-up snowpack in ESMs with ERA5 or MERRA2 to obtain realistic firn depth and air content required to project ice sheet, ice shelf, and sea-level rise responses to global warming. We implemented and now use ERA5 (instead of CRUNCEP7) in E3SM for more robust surface mass balance and sea-level rise studies.

Summary

Sea-level rise (SLR) projections by Earth System Models (ESMs) depend on ice sheet surface mass balances. Accurate, global atmosphere reanalyses would be ideal for providing equilibrated ice sheet model initial conditions in fully coupled ESM simulations. Here we present the first evaluation of 1980–1990 global reanalysis of precipitation over Greenland and Antarctica that uses independent observations of net accumulation rates derived from shallow ice cores. Precipitation distributions from both the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast's Reanalysis (ERA5) and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) are highly correlated with contemporaneous co-located net accumulation rates from Greenland (r^2 > 0.95) and West Antarctica (r^2 > 0.7). Three other commonly used reanalyses (WFDE5, CRUNCEP, and GSWP3) exhibit significantly weaker correlations on one or both ice sheets. Our findings imply that ESMs should use ERA5 or MERRA-2 in data-forced simulations to validate ice sheet model dynamics and preconditions firn for SLR projections.

Point of Contact
Charlie Zender
Institution(s)
University of California Irvine (UC Irvine)
Funding Program Area(s)
Publication